Comments on: Battlefield 1943 Q&A

By: abed112

abed112 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:27:02 +0000

hoe kan je dit downladen

By: Battlefield 1943 Trailer :: The Gaming Group

Battlefield 1943 Trailer :: The Gaming Group — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:29:03 +0000

[...] on the 360, PS3 and PC platforms and will apparently be available as a download-only game (see the Gustav Halling’s blog). The launch date is as yet unconfirmed, but is thought to be towards the last quarter of [...]

By: Arksmasher

Arksmasher — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:42:02 +0000

Hi
I must admit that when i saw the site for Bf 1943 i was actually looking forward to it (because i didt realise how just how much the game is changing)
I love Bf2 and Bf2142,I even enjoyed Bf 1942 ,But even I realise that you are changing the game so much for consoles that the teamplay is going to be non existent,No medics or support ?? as for the 24 player limit ,That is just crazy I love the 64/40 man maps and quite often struggle to get on a map as they r always full…Please rethink this game…Ps Release Patch 1.5 cmon guys play fair…B

By: Gustav

Gustav — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:31:57 +0000

Thx, I had it on my site just wasent activated.

I also have user registration right now for commenting. Maybe i can remove it if I use akismet?

By: dazbobaby

dazbobaby — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:26:49 +0000

You badly need Akismet, it’ll stop all this spam…
http://akismet.com/

Can’t wait for the game, it’ll keep me busy until BFBC2.
http://www.mess-hall.co.uk

By: mario

mario — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:27:41 +0000

cs2TbJ h1! nice site! oxyutelno

By: A UGA DaWGfan

A UGA DaWGfan — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:54:41 +0000

Xbox 360 question-Will it be possible for 12 people on my Friend’s List to join a match and play together as well as have voice communication with each other during the match unlike in BFBC where you were restricted to 4 man parties and chat.

By: Blah

Blah — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:23:06 +0000

I honestly can not see how DICE can release this game and charge more than $10-$15 bucks for it. This is most definitely NOT a new game by any standard of the word. This is almost by definition, an expansion pack at best. How can you have charged $50 for a game like BF2 or 2142, rich with features, strategic game play elements, competent server capacities, numerous maps etc… Then a few years later, create a second “sequel” to your first BF game, with dumbed down game play, less features and three maps…and charge the same price?

Unlimited ammo? Regenerating Life? WTF DICE? Why don’t you just throw in tactical nukes and quad damages?

Four more years down the road should we expect BF 1944 with three “new” re-hashed maps and an added class? If this comes out as a standalone game, then it’s on the basis of pure laziness and lack of dedication to the fans that made this franchise great. Remember DICE, without the players, there is no game..and so far, everyone I know of that played the BF games religiously have already laughed this newest edition off

By: TNx|Just^stoned

TNx|Just^stoned — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:47:43 +0000

and pls dont include regenerating health in the game.
one of the most fascinating aspects of bf is its high demand for teamplay.
if you give away the possibility of health packs or reviving a great deal of teamplay falls apart.
but this teamplay determins bf and separates it from ohter shooters. if I wannted to have regenerating health I would play CoD and not bf.

By: TNx|Just^stoned

TNx|Just^stoned — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:42:05 +0000

Dear Mr. Halling,

I would like to ask you to overthink what you are doing. The last time when two Battlefields existed at the same time (Bf2 and bf2142) the community almost split. since bf2142 was a failure in the eyes of many the completly turned away fom bf.
In my opinion BF2 was the greatest tactical shooter ever to be released but got ruined by bad patch work and support, etc.
What makes games great? Looking at Counterstrike or WC3 I say its professional e-sports with lots of money input and media attention which cause huge communities.
Same going on now with CoD4.
As I said I believe that a good successor of Bf2 (which already hat EPS etc.) can easiely reach the class of Counterstrike.
The setting of Bf2 in modern time was good and these scenarios find the most fans as the rise of cod4: modern warfare and the flop of cod5 shows.
You should focus on BF Bad company 2 with a good balance for an infantry mod because here lies the basic for competetive e-sports.
What should be fixed is: Hitbox
Netcode
and pls pls pls get rid of ingame dust